Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs OGMNX
EKWCX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs OGMNX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.45
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$35.56
Change+$0.18 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.74B
EKWCX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. OGMNX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and OGMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 2.74B vs. EKWCX (663M). OGMNX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: OGMNX (0.57) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: EKWCX (27 years) vs OGMNX (24 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than OGMNX (1.36). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. EKWCX (11.00). EKWCX (1000) and OGMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.04 vs. OGMNX (47.65). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 64.52 vs. OGMNX (54.24).
| EKWCX | OGMNX | EKWCX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.36 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.36 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.429 | 46.700 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 2.74B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.57 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.04 | 47.65 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.34 | 86.78 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.52 | 54.24 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.80 | 239.51 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement