Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs OGMNX
EKWCX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs OGMNX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.36
Change+$0.25 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.86M
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$35.90
Change+$0.16 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
EKWCX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. OGMNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and OGMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 2.77B vs. EKWCX (682M). OGMNX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: OGMNX (0.57) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: EKWCX (28 years) vs OGMNX (24 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than OGMNX (1.36). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX (1000) and OGMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.88 vs. OGMNX (47.30). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.10 vs. OGMNX (38.30).
| EKWCX | OGMNX | EKWCX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.36 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.36 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.245 | 48.102 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 2.77B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.57 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.88 | 47.30 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 140.37 | 106.86 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.10 | 38.30 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.33 | 325.57 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement