Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs OGMNX
EKWCX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs OGMNX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$85.27
Change+$0.73 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$38.98
Change+$0.49 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.01B
EKWCX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. OGMNX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and OGMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 3.01B vs. EKWCX (761M). OGMNX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: OGMNX (0.58) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: EKWCX (28 years) vs OGMNX (24 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than OGMNX (1.36). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX (1000) and OGMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.11 vs. OGMNX (56.68). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.33 vs. OGMNX (52.13).
| EKWCX | OGMNX | EKWCX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.36 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.36 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 74.376 | 60.809 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 3.01B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.58 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.11 | 56.68 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 143.02 | 102.64 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.33 | 52.13 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 283.87 | 332.95 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement