Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs OGMNX
EKWCX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs OGMNX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$98.76
Change+$1.69 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.58M
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$44.43
Change+$0.64 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.39B
EKWCX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. OGMNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and OGMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 3.39B vs. EKWCX (904M). OGMNX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: OGMNX (0.48) vs EKWCX (0.05). EKWCX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: EKWCX (28 years) vs OGMNX (25 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than OGMNX (1.36). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX (1000) and OGMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 101.74 vs. OGMNX (85.39). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 81.41 vs. OGMNX (63.80).
| EKWCX | OGMNX | EKWCX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.36 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.36 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 101.963 | 83.292 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 3.39B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.48 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 101.74 | 85.39 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 196.85 | 146.23 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.41 | 63.80 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 395.72 | 436.53 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers