Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs IOGYX
EKWCX vs IOGYX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs IOGYX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$144.17
Change+$0.53 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R5
Price$67.71
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.8B
EKWCX vs IOGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. IOGYX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and IOGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IOGYX has more cash in the bank: 4.8B vs. EKWCX (1.56B). IOGYX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: IOGYX (0.56) vs EKWCX (0.44). EKWCX was incepted earlier than IOGYX: EKWCX (28 years) vs IOGYX (7 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than IOGYX (0.73). IOGYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IOGYX: EKWCX (1000) vs IOGYX (1000000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 152.23 vs. IOGYX (130.57). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 220.56 vs. IOGYX (172.51).
| EKWCX | IOGYX | EKWCX / IOGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.73 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.73 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.818 | 14.317 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 4.8B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.56 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 152.23 | 130.57 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 261.69 | 196.82 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 220.56 | 172.51 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 497.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement