Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$112.85
Change-$2.41 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FSAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.41B vs. EKWCX (1.12B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (1.71) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX (127.69) and FSAGX (122.28) have marching annual gain over last year. EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 127.72 vs. FSAGX (92.84).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.68 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.68 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 130.777 | 124.369 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 3.41B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.71 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 127.69 | 122.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 206.19 | 168.00 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 127.72 | 92.84 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 448.43 | 360.68 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement