Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$144.17
Change+$0.53 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$67.43
Change+$0.21 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.93B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 4.93B vs. EKWCX (1.56B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (1.96) vs EKWCX (0.44). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 152.23 vs. FSAGX (139.68). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 220.56 vs. FSAGX (160.92).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.68 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.68 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.818 | 14.985 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 4.93B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.96 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 152.23 | 139.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 261.69 | 201.58 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 220.56 | 160.92 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 497.93 | 378.29 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement