Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FGADX
EKWCX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$85.27
Change+$0.73 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$33.86
Change+$0.54 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
EKWCX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FGADX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. EKWCX (761M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FGADX (7.88) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX (14.50) and EKWCX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: EKWCX (1000) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX (74.42) and EKWCX (71.11) have marching annual gain over last year. FGADX (62.79) and EKWCX (62.33) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWCX | FGADX | EKWCX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.67 | 275% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.67 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 74.376 | 78.775 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 1.65B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 7.88 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.11 | 74.42 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 143.02 | 114.95 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.33 | 62.79 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 283.87 | 296.65 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement