Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FGADX
EKWCX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$98.76
Change+$1.69 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.58M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$40.22
Change+$0.64 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
EKWCX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FGADX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. EKWCX (904M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FGADX (6.42) vs EKWCX (0.05). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX (14.50) and EKWCX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: EKWCX (1000) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 113.04 vs. EKWCX (101.74). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 86.80 vs. EKWCX (81.41).
| EKWCX | FGADX | EKWCX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.67 | 275% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.67 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 101.963 | 112.355 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 1.98B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 6.42 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 101.74 | 113.04 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 196.85 | 178.15 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.41 | 86.80 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 395.72 | 408.46 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement