Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$80.91
Change+$1.38 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets669.9M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. EKWCX (670M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (3.76) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 86.82 vs. FEURX (62.86). EKWCX (87.78) and FEURX (85.98) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.83 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 65.460 | 53.217 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 670M | 3.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.76 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 86.82 | 62.86 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.28 | 88.52 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.78 | 85.98 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers