Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.45
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. EKWCX (663M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (3.67) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.04 vs. FEURX (51.09). FEURX return over 5 years is better than : 67.84 vs. EKWCX (64.52).
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.83 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.429 | 48.496 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 3.69B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.67 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.04 | 51.09 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.34 | 89.65 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.52 | 67.84 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement