Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$144.17
Change+$0.53 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 6.01B vs. EKWCX (1.56B). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (1.14) vs EKWCX (0.44). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEURX (9 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.34 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 152.23 vs. FEURX (125.20). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 220.56 vs. FEURX (193.92).
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.83 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.818 | 15.140 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 6.01B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.14 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 152.23 | 125.20 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 261.69 | 194.15 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 220.56 | 193.92 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 497.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement