Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.36
Change+$0.25 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.86M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FEURX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.75B vs. EKWCX (682M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (3.67) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.88 vs. FEURX (46.63). FEURX return over 5 years is better than : 51.56 vs. EKWCX (45.10).
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.83 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.245 | 49.753 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 3.75B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.67 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.88 | 46.63 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 140.37 | 108.21 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.10 | 51.56 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement