Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.45
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. EKWCX (663M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (3.45) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.04 vs. FEGOX (49.51). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 64.52 vs. FEGOX (59.47).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.91 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.429 | 47.719 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 3.69B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.45 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.04 | 49.51 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.34 | 83.63 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.52 | 59.47 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.80 | 171.70 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement