Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$119.28
Change+$0.76 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEGOX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. EKWCX (1.2B). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (2.36) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (23 years). EKWCX (1.92) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 121.74 vs. FEGOX (94.78). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 156.38 vs. FEGOX (123.60).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 142.372 | 111.140 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 5.13B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.36 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 121.74 | 94.78 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 204.02 | 143.49 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 156.38 | 123.60 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 438.61 | 344.32 | 127% |