Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$113.43
Change-$7.40 (-6.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 5.01B vs. EKWCX (1.17B). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (2.58) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.92) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 102.45 vs. FEGOX (74.75). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 117.14 vs. FEGOX (96.20).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 131.963 | 102.018 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 5.01B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.58 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 102.45 | 74.75 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 263.90 | 181.25 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.14 | 96.20 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 373.05 | 291.29 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement