Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.36
Change+$0.25 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.86M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FEGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.75B vs. EKWCX (682M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (3.45) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.88 vs. FEGOX (45.06). EKWCX (45.10) and FEGOX (43.99) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.91 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.245 | 48.860 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 3.75B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.45 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.88 | 45.06 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 140.37 | 101.61 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.10 | 43.99 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.33 | 228.16 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement