Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$85.27
Change+$0.73 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FEGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWCX (761M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (3.51) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.11 vs. FEGOX (48.59). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.33 vs. FEGOX (51.46).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.91 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 74.376 | 56.711 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 3.94B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.51 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.11 | 48.59 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 143.02 | 101.08 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.33 | 51.46 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 283.87 | 226.36 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement