Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$98.76
Change+$1.69 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.58M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 4.49B vs. EKWCX (904M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (3.01) vs EKWCX (0.05). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.92) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 101.74 vs. FEGOX (73.17). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 81.41 vs. FEGOX (66.25).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 101.963 | 78.640 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 4.49B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 3.01 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 101.74 | 73.17 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 196.85 | 138.57 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.41 | 66.25 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 395.72 | 304.54 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers