Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGIX
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$134.08
Change+$1.55 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGIX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 5.8B vs. EKWCX (1.39B). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGIX (2.46) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGIX (23 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 171.36 vs. FEGIX (135.52). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 183.98 vs. FEGIX (158.16).
| EKWCX | FEGIX | EKWCX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.93 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.93 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 174.192 | 138.664 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 5.8B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.46 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 171.36 | 135.52 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 248.04 | 176.53 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 183.98 | 158.16 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 548.17 | 475.84 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement