Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGIX
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$106.90
Change+$2.14 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGIX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 4.8B vs. EKWCX (1.06B). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGIX (3.14) vs EKWCX (0.05). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGIX (22 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 92.20 vs. FEGIX (67.09). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 113.65 vs. FEGIX (101.39).
| EKWCX | FEGIX | EKWCX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.93 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.93 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 118.609 | 93.969 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 4.8B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 3.14 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 92.20 | 67.09 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 267.82 | 192.26 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.65 | 101.39 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 426.88 | 374.86 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers