Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGIX
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.45
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGIX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. EKWCX (663M). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGIX (3.62) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEGIX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.04 vs. FEGIX (50.95). FEGIX (67.06) and EKWCX (64.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWCX | FEGIX | EKWCX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.93 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.93 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.429 | 48.435 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 3.69B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.62 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.04 | 50.95 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.34 | 89.09 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.52 | 67.06 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.80 | 200.28 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement