Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs OGMNX
EKWAX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs OGMNX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$113.47
Change+$1.95 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.58M
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$44.43
Change+$0.64 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.39B
EKWAX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. OGMNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and OGMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 3.39B vs. EKWAX (904M). OGMNX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: OGMNX (0.48) vs EKWAX (0.44). EKWAX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: EKWAX (28 years) vs OGMNX (25 years). OGMNX (1.36) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.17). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX (1000) and OGMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 94.20 vs. OGMNX (77.57). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 95.27 vs. OGMNX (66.18).
| EKWAX | OGMNX | EKWAX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.36 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.36 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 99.535 | 80.652 | 123% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 3.39B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.48 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 94.20 | 77.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 223.29 | 161.99 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.27 | 66.18 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 425.97 | 418.57 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers