Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$136.41
Change-$0.97 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$56.08
Change-$0.27 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.94B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FSAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWAX (1.2B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (1.47) vs EKWAX (0.33). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 123.46 vs. FSAGX (109.84). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 171.07 vs. FSAGX (108.80).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.68 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 144.069 | 128.153 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 3.94B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.47 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 123.46 | 109.84 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 216.42 | 156.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.07 | 108.80 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 495.82 | 337.68 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement