Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$129.83
Change-$2.77 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FSAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.41B vs. EKWAX (1.12B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (1.71) vs EKWAX (0.39). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 129.41 vs. FSAGX (122.28). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 140.79 vs. FSAGX (92.84).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.68 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 132.296 | 124.369 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 3.41B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.71 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 129.41 | 122.28 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 218.70 | 168.00 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 140.79 | 92.84 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 506.80 | 360.68 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement