Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$90.01
Change+$0.54 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$38.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FSAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. EKWAX (663M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (2.21) vs EKWAX (0.53). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.37 vs. FSAGX (63.33). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.97 vs. FSAGX (42.85).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.68 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 61.048 | 57.608 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 2.36B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 2.21 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.37 | 63.33 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.97 | 88.96 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.97 | 42.85 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 238.38 | 166.74 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement