Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$89.95
Change+$0.29 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.86M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$39.39
Change+$0.22 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. EKWAX (682M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (2.21) vs EKWAX (0.53). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 66.16 vs. FSAGX (59.44). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.45 vs. FSAGX (26.99).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.68 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.941 | 60.252 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 2.36B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 2.21 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 66.16 | 59.44 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 150.18 | 113.21 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.45 | 26.99 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 325.16 | 235.05 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement