Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$92.80
Change+$1.59 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets669.9M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$40.02
Change+$0.70 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. EKWAX (670M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (2.29) vs EKWAX (0.55). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 88.26 vs. FSAGX (75.30). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 98.57 vs. FSAGX (63.02).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.68 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 66.040 | 62.815 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 670M | 2.24B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 2.29 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 88.26 | 75.30 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.94 | 78.85 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.57 | 63.02 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.83 | 171.21 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement