Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$122.87
Change+$2.47 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$52.01
Change+$1.13 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. EKWAX (1.06B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (1.88) vs EKWAX (0.44). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 93.66 vs. FSAGX (82.66). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 125.94 vs. FSAGX (81.00).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.68 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 119.843 | 111.595 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 2.85B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.88 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 93.66 | 82.66 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 282.84 | 218.25 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 125.94 | 81.00 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 483.04 | 340.04 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement