Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEURX
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$124.50
Change-$5.49 (-4.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEURX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FEURX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 5.77B vs. EKWAX (1.52B). FEURX (1.14) and EKWAX (1.10) have matching dividends . EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEURX (9 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.34 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FEURX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 151.90 vs. FEURX (119.62). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 225.61 vs. FEURX (178.08).
| EKWAX | FEURX | EKWAX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.83 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.522 | 9.330 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 5.77B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.14 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 151.90 | 119.62 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 255.74 | 179.31 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 225.61 | 178.08 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 535.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers