Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$90.01
Change+$0.54 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. EKWAX (663M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (3.45) vs EKWAX (0.53). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.19). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (11.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.37 vs. FEGOX (49.51). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.97 vs. FEGOX (59.47).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.91 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 61.048 | 47.719 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 3.69B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 3.45 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.37 | 49.51 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.97 | 83.63 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.97 | 59.47 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 238.38 | 171.70 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers