Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$130.44
Change-$8.49 (-6.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 5.01B vs. EKWAX (1.17B). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (2.58) vs EKWAX (0.38). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.17). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 104.06 vs. FEGOX (74.75). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 129.66 vs. FEGOX (96.20).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.91 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 133.387 | 102.018 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 5.01B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 2.58 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 104.06 | 74.75 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 278.67 | 181.25 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 129.66 | 96.20 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 423.30 | 291.29 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement