Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$129.83
Change-$2.77 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. EKWAX (1.12B). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (2.71) vs EKWAX (0.39). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEGOX (23 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.17). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 129.41 vs. FEGOX (94.06). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 140.79 vs. FEGOX (100.92).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.91 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 132.296 | 99.956 | 132% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 4.95B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 2.71 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 129.41 | 94.06 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 218.70 | 142.03 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 140.79 | 100.92 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 506.80 | 343.64 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement