Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$89.95
Change+$0.29 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.86M
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and FEGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.75B vs. EKWAX (682M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (3.45) vs EKWAX (0.53). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.19). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 66.16 vs. FEGOX (45.06). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.45 vs. FEGOX (43.99).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.91 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.941 | 48.860 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 3.75B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 3.45 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 66.16 | 45.06 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 150.18 | 101.61 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.45 | 43.99 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 325.16 | 228.16 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement