Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$92.80
Change+$1.59 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets669.9M
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. EKWAX (670M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (3.53) vs EKWAX (0.55). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.19). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (11.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 88.26 vs. FEGOX (61.18). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 98.57 vs. FEGOX (76.74).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.91 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 66.040 | 52.500 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 670M | 3.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 3.53 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 88.26 | 61.18 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.94 | 82.56 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.57 | 76.74 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.83 | 174.42 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement