Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGIX
EKWAX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$129.83
Change-$2.77 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
EKWAX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. EKWAX (1.12B). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGIX (2.82) vs EKWAX (0.39). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEGIX (23 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 130.67 vs. FEGIX (96.97). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 145.93 vs. FEGIX (114.09).
| EKWAX | FEGIX | EKWAX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.93 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.93 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 137.252 | 105.076 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 4.95B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 2.82 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 130.67 | 96.97 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 222.49 | 151.90 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 145.93 | 114.09 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 524.04 | 400.76 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement