Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSYX vs HBLCX
EKSYX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts EKSYX vs HBLCX
Allspring Diversified Income Bldr Inst
Price$6.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.58M
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.94B
EKSYX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSYX vs. HBLCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSYX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. EKSYX (363M). EKSYX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: EKSYX (5.69) vs HBLCX (2.58). EKSYX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: EKSYX (29 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than EKSYX (0.87). EKSYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. HBLCX (61.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKSYX: HBLCX (2000) vs EKSYX (1000000). EKSYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.42 vs. HBLCX (2.50). EKSYX return over 5 years is better than : 34.87 vs. HBLCX (11.86).
| EKSYX | HBLCX | EKSYX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.64 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.428 | 7.405 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 363M | 11.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.69 | 2.58 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.42 | 2.50 | 497% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.66 | 15.65 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.87 | 11.86 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.79 | 37.40 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers