Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSDX vs HBLCX
EKSDX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts EKSDX vs HBLCX
Allspring Diversified Income Bldr Adm
Price$6.23
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets364.27M
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
EKSDX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSDX vs. HBLCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSDX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. EKSDX (364M). EKSDX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: EKSDX (5.54) vs HBLCX (2.64). EKSDX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: EKSDX (15 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than EKSDX (1.12). EKSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. HBLCX (61.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKSDX: HBLCX (2000) vs EKSDX (1000000). EKSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.20 vs. HBLCX (3.34). EKSDX return over 5 years is better than : 33.06 vs. HBLCX (10.72).
| EKSDX | HBLCX | EKSDX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.64 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.64 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.797 | 6.604 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 11.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.54 | 2.64 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.20 | 3.34 | 365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.67 | 8.52 | 360% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.06 | 10.72 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.24 | 32.45 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers