Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGAHX
EKJFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGAHX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr R6
Price$14.90
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
EKJFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. EKJFX (1.46B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EKJFX: RGAHX (0.47) vs EKJFX (0.00). EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EKJFX (13 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EKJFX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: EKJFX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. EKJFX (15.33). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.57 vs. EKJFX (-10.83).
| EKJFX | RGAHX | EKJFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.44 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.481 | 13.426 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.33 | 17.89 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.27 | 58.90 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.83 | 49.57 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement