Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGAHX
EKJFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGAHX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr R6
Price$15.28
Change-$0.39 (-2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
EKJFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. EKJFX (1.48B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EKJFX: RGAHX (0.44) vs EKJFX (0.00). EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EKJFX (13 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EKJFX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: EKJFX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. EKJFX (-1.93). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. EKJFX (-19.66).
| EKJFX | RGAHX | EKJFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.44 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.375 | 19.894 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.93 | 9.02 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.72 | 65.43 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.66 | 40.79 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement