Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr R6
Price$15.28
Change-$0.39 (-2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. EKJFX (1.48B). RGACX pays higher dividends than EKJFX: RGACX (0.07) vs EKJFX (0.00). EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJFX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than EKJFX (0.73). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: EKJFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. EKJFX (-1.93). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. EKJFX (-19.66).
| EKJFX | RGACX | EKJFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.94 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.375 | 19.364 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.93 | 8.31 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.72 | 63.31 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.66 | 37.90 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.78 | 98.36 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement