Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr R6
Price$12.48
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. EKJFX (1.42B). RGACX pays higher dividends than EKJFX: RGACX (0.07) vs EKJFX (0.00). EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJFX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than EKJFX (0.73). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: EKJFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. EKJFX (-7.96). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.41 vs. EKJFX (-32.17).
| EKJFX | RGACX | EKJFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.93 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.950 | 8.807 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.96 | 5.61 | -142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.13 | 64.57 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.17 | 20.41 | -158% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.95 | 90.45 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement