Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJCX vs RGAHX
EKJCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EKJCX vs RGAHX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr C
Price$2.91
Change-$0.04 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
EKJCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. EKJCX (1.37B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EKJCX: RGAHX (0.50) vs EKJCX (0.00). EKJCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EKJCX (27 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EKJCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EKJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJCX: RGAHX (250) vs EKJCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. EKJCX (-32.48). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.84 vs. EKJCX (-71.33).
| EKJCX | RGAHX | EKJCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.44 | 420% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.44 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.929 | 5.147 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.37B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.48 | 7.38 | -440% |
| Returns for 3 years | -49.74 | 53.85 | -92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -71.33 | 49.84 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | -79.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement