Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJCX vs RGAHX
EKJCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EKJCX vs RGAHX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr C
Price$3.10
Change+$0.04 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
EKJCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. EKJCX (1.45B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EKJCX: RGAHX (0.47) vs EKJCX (0.00). EKJCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EKJCX (27 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EKJCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EKJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJCX: RGAHX (250) vs EKJCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. EKJCX (-30.34). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. EKJCX (-71.27).
| EKJCX | RGAHX | EKJCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.44 | 420% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.44 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.714 | 11.275 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.34 | 10.98 | -276% |
| Returns for 3 years | -47.90 | 60.14 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -71.27 | 50.13 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | -77.71 | N/A | - |