Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGEBX
EKJAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGEBX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$9.11
Change-$3.91 (-30.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
EKJAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. EKJAX (1.32B). EKJAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGEBX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. EKJAX (-17.33). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. EKJAX (-48.79).
| EKJAX | RGEBX | EKJAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.08 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.08 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.291 | -1.057 | 311% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.33 | 1.80 | -964% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.18 | 41.63 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.79 | 9.88 | -494% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.58 | 110.02 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers