Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGAHX
EKJAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGAHX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$11.96
Change+$0.16 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
EKJAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. EKJAX (1.45B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EKJAX: RGAHX (0.47) vs EKJAX (0.00). EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EKJAX (27 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGAHX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. EKJAX (2.93). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. EKJAX (-21.37).
| EKJAX | RGAHX | EKJAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.44 | 250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.44 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.463 | 11.275 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 10.98 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.11 | 60.14 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.37 | 50.13 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.59 | N/A | - |