Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGAHX
EKJAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGAHX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$9.11
Change-$3.91 (-30.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
EKJAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. EKJAX (1.32B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EKJAX: RGAHX (0.43) vs EKJAX (0.00). EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGAHX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. EKJAX (-17.33). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. EKJAX (-48.79).
| EKJAX | RGAHX | EKJAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.44 | 250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.44 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.291 | -1.010 | 326% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.33 | 2.79 | -621% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.18 | 45.40 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.79 | 13.96 | -350% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.58 | 119.50 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement