Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGACX
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$9.48
Change-$0.15 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.65
Change-$0.84 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. EKJAX (1.39B). EKJAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGACX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. EKJAX (-11.81). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. EKJAX (-43.60).
| EKJAX | RGACX | EKJAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.93 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.93 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.637 | 1.549 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.81 | 8.96 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.93 | 54.48 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.60 | 18.14 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.63 | 115.80 | -24% |