Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGACX
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$9.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. EKJAX (1.42B). RGACX pays higher dividends than EKJAX: RGACX (0.07) vs EKJAX (0.00). EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGACX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. EKJAX (-13.78). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. EKJAX (-43.41).
| EKJAX | RGACX | EKJAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.93 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.93 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.811 | 8.821 | -123% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.78 | 5.45 | -253% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.11 | 63.36 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.41 | 20.43 | -212% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.76 | 92.34 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement