Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGCX vs SMCWX
EKGCX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs SMCWX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$20.78
Change+$0.16 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.03M
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$74.58
Change+$0.28 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
EKGCX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. SMCWX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. EKGCX (117M). SMCWX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: SMCWX (0.57) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: EKGCX (33 years) vs SMCWX (35 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.04). EKGCX (32.00) and SMCWX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: SMCWX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. EKGCX (-7.56). SMCWX return over 5 years is better than : 16.45 vs. EKGCX (-14.77).
| EKGCX | SMCWX | EKGCX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.04 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.04 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.119 | 10.707 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.56 | 5.79 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.68 | 45.43 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.77 | 16.45 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.53 | 71.06 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers