Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGAX vs SMCWX
EKGAX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts EKGAX vs SMCWX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap A
Price$39.19
Change+$0.16 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.74M
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$76.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
EKGAX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGAX vs. SMCWX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGAX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. EKGAX (120M). EKGAX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: EKGAX (1.11) vs SMCWX (0.70). EKGAX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: EKGAX (38 years) vs SMCWX (36 years). EKGAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.03). EKGAX (6%) and SMCWX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGAX: SMCWX (250) vs EKGAX (1000). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.59 vs. EKGAX (10.79). SMCWX return over 5 years is better than : -4.74 vs. EKGAX (-15.22).
| EKGAX | SMCWX | EKGAX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.03 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.03 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.786 | 4.202 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.70 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 15.59 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 29.55 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.22 | -4.74 | 321% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.21 | 100.04 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement