Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGAX vs SMCWX
EKGAX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts EKGAX vs SMCWX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap A
Price$38.36
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.77M
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$74.38
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
EKGAX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGAX vs. SMCWX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGAX is a Buy and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. EKGAX (117M). SMCWX pays higher dividends than EKGAX: SMCWX (0.56) vs EKGAX (0.17). EKGAX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: EKGAX (38 years) vs SMCWX (36 years). EKGAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.03). EKGAX (6%) and SMCWX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGAX: SMCWX (250) vs EKGAX (1000). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. EKGAX (4.33). SMCWX return over 5 years is better than : -5.49 vs. EKGAX (-13.63).
| EKGAX | SMCWX | EKGAX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.03 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.03 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.211 | 10.410 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.56 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.33 | 9.13 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.32 | 34.63 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.63 | -5.49 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.87 | 71.89 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement