Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKBCX vs RGNBX
EKBCX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts EKBCX vs RGNBX
Allspring Diversified Cap Bldr C
Price$16.34
Change+$0.48 (+3.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$21.50
Change-$0.17 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
EKBCX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKBCX vs. RGNBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKBCX is a Hold and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. EKBCX (1.93B). RGNBX pays higher dividends than EKBCX: RGNBX (0.99) vs EKBCX (0.01). EKBCX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: EKBCX (28 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). EKBCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGNBX (1.40). EKBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). RGNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKBCX: RGNBX (250) vs EKBCX (1000). EKBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.50 vs. RGNBX (11.99). EKBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.42 vs. RGNBX (27.42).
| EKBCX | RGNBX | EKBCX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 1.40 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 1.40 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.933 | 2.041 | 438% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 21.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.99 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.50 | 11.99 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.59 | 40.43 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.42 | 27.42 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.14 | 87.66 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement