Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKBAX vs RGNBX
EKBAX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts EKBAX vs RGNBX
Allspring Diversified Cap Bldr A
Price$15.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$22.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
EKBAX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKBAX vs. RGNBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKBAX is a Hold and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. EKBAX (1.74B). RGNBX pays higher dividends than EKBAX: RGNBX (0.93) vs EKBAX (0.55). EKBAX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: EKBAX (28 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). RGNBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than EKBAX (1.08). EKBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). RGNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKBAX: RGNBX (250) vs EKBAX (1000). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.01 vs. EKBAX (10.48). RGNBX (35.94) and EKBAX (34.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKBAX | RGNBX | EKBAX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.40 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.40 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.581 | 18.225 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 21.9B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.93 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 13.01 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.70 | 45.53 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.29 | 35.94 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.68 | 79.94 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement