EJPRY vs GRPTF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EJPRY is a Hold and GRPTF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EJPRY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRPTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EJPRY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GRPTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EJPRY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EJPRY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EJPRY (@Railroads) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while GRPTF (@Railroads) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.14%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Railroads (+1.59% weekly)The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.
| EJPRY | GRPTF | EJPRY / GRPTF | |
| Capitalization | 19.1B | 8.46B | 226% |
| EBITDA | 780B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.643 | 0.656 | -708% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.50 | 24.82 | 54% |
| Revenue | 2.83T | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 369B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 4.72T | N/A | - |
EJPRY | GRPTF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GRPTF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as EJPRY (85). This means that GRPTF’s stock grew similarly to EJPRY’s over the last 12 months.
GRPTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as EJPRY (100). This means that GRPTF’s stock grew similarly to EJPRY’s over the last 12 months.
GRPTF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as EJPRY (100). This means that GRPTF’s stock grew similarly to EJPRY’s over the last 12 months.
EJPRY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as GRPTF (74). This means that EJPRY’s stock grew similarly to GRPTF’s over the last 12 months.
GRPTF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as EJPRY (73). This means that GRPTF’s stock grew similarly to EJPRY’s over the last 12 months.
| EJPRY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% |
EJPRY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EJPRY has been closely correlated with CJPRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EJPRY jumps, then CJPRY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EJPRY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EJPRY | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| CJPRY - EJPRY | 67% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| WJRYY - EJPRY | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| TRN - EJPRY | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
| WJRYF - EJPRY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CP - EJPRY | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
GRPTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRPTF and JFBHF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRPTF and JFBHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| JFBHF - GRPTF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FGROY - GRPTF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EJPRY - GRPTF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| GRPOF - GRPTF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FGROF - GRPTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||