Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIVAX vs RMFCX
EIVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIVAX vs RMFCX
Allspring Special Large Cap Value A
Price$15.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.27
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.07B
EIVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. EIVAX (2.15B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EIVAX: RMFCX (1.21) vs EIVAX (0.61). EIVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIVAX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and EIVAX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . EIVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIVAX: RMFCX (250) vs EIVAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. EIVAX (1.28). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. EIVAX (24.23).
| EIVAX | RMFCX | EIVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.297 | 15.093 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.21 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 6.67 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 30.56 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.23 | 54.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.30 | 94.04 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement