Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIUTX vs RWMHX
EIUTX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts EIUTX vs RWMHX
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder I
Price$16.14
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.15M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.51
Change-$0.21 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
EIUTX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIUTX vs. RWMHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIUTX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. EIUTX (876M). EIUTX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: EIUTX (1.48) vs RWMHX (1.38). EIUTX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: EIUTX (21 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). EIUTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). EIUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIUTX: RWMHX (250) vs EIUTX (1000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. EIUTX (4.27). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 38.67 vs. EIUTX (2.21).
| EIUTX | RWMHX | EIUTX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.41 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.41 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.803 | 2.292 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 876M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.38 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.27 | 10.36 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.22 | 31.48 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.21 | 38.67 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.34 | 101.46 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers