Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EISMX vs RRMGX
EISMX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts EISMX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap I
Price$37.50
Change+$0.06 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.19B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$85.79
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
EISMX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EISMX vs. RRMGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EISMX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. EISMX (12.2B). EISMX pays higher dividends than RRMGX: EISMX (0.16) vs RRMGX (0.00). EISMX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: EISMX (24 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than EISMX (0.87). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. EISMX (9.00). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EISMX: RRMGX (2500) vs EISMX (1000000). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.37 vs. EISMX (-11.35). EISMX return over 5 years is better than : 0.76 vs. RRMGX (-18.01).
| EISMX | RRMGX | EISMX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.29 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.29 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.834 | -2.423 | 406% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 25.6B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.35 | -4.37 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.99 | 7.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.76 | -18.01 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.94 | 21.45 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers