Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EISAX vs HFQRX
EISAX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts EISAX vs HFQRX
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock A
Price$30.35
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets798.23M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
EISAX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EISAX vs. HFQRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EISAX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.59B vs. EISAX (798M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than EISAX: HFQRX (7.29) vs EISAX (2.27). EISAX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: EISAX (13 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). EISAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. EISAX (23.00). EISAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: EISAX (1000) vs HFQRX (1000000). EISAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.19 vs. HFQRX (18.67). EISAX return over 5 years is better than : 103.85 vs. HFQRX (74.11).
| EISAX | HFQRX | EISAX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.650 | 23.469 | 131% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 798M | 6.59B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 7.29 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.19 | 18.67 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.38 | 63.05 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.85 | 74.11 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement