Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIPFX vs SMRPX
EIPFX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIPFX vs. SMRPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIPFX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. EIPFX (82.6M). SMRPX pays higher dividends than EIPFX: SMRPX (4.22) vs EIPFX (2.44). EIPFX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: EIPFX (9 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). EIPFX (2.13) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. EIPFX (44.00). EIPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: EIPFX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. EIPFX (2.67). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 135.35 vs. EIPFX (58.16).
| EIPFX | SMRPX | EIPFX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.02 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.05 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.511 | 8.317 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.6M | 1.31B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 4.22 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 7.66 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.29 | 70.88 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.16 | 135.35 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 213.70 | - |