Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIPFX vs SMRPX
EIPFX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIPFX vs. SMRPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIPFX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. EIPFX (79.1M). SMRPX pays higher dividends than EIPFX: SMRPX (4.44) vs EIPFX (2.51). EIPFX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: EIPFX (9 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). EIPFX (2.13) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EIPFX (40.00). EIPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: EIPFX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.40 vs. EIPFX (11.13). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 147.66 vs. EIPFX (71.37).
| EIPFX | SMRPX | EIPFX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.02 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.05 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.077 | 3.254 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.1M | 1.28B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 4.44 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.13 | 16.40 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.49 | 56.44 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.37 | 147.66 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement