Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIPFX vs SMFPX
EIPFX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIPFX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIPFX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. EIPFX (82.6M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than EIPFX: SMFPX (3.19) vs EIPFX (2.44). EIPFX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EIPFX (9 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) and EIPFX (2.13) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. EIPFX (44.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIPFX: SMFPX (1000) vs EIPFX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. EIPFX (2.67). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 123.81 vs. EIPFX (58.16).
| EIPFX | SMFPX | EIPFX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 2.15 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.511 | 8.213 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.6M | 1.29B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 3.19 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 6.78 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.29 | 66.05 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.16 | 123.81 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 182.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement