EIPAF
Price
$19.14
Change
+$0.15 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
56.49B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NFG
Price
$80.56
Change
+$0.71 (+0.89%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
7.65B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIPAF vs NFG

Header iconEIPAF vs NFG Comparison
Open Charts EIPAF vs NFGBanner chart's image
ENI S.p.A
Price$19.14
Change+$0.15 (+0.79%)
Volume$4.9K
Capitalization56.49B
National Fuel Gas
Price$80.56
Change+$0.71 (+0.89%)
Volume$675.95K
Capitalization7.65B
EIPAF vs NFG Comparison Chart in %
EIPAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIPAF vs. NFG commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIPAF is a Hold and NFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (EIPAF: $19.14 vs. NFG: $80.56)
Brand notoriety: EIPAF and NFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIPAF: 400% vs. NFG: 107%
Market capitalization -- EIPAF: $56.49B vs. NFG: $7.65B
EIPAF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $56.49B. NFG’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $7.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $549.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIPAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EIPAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the long-term than NFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIPAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EIPAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the short-term than NFG.

Price Growth

EIPAF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while NFG (@Integrated Oil) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

NFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+2.01% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIPAF($56.5B) has a higher market cap than NFG($7.66B). EIPAF has higher P/E ratio than NFG: EIPAF (20.05) vs NFG (14.18). NFG YTD gains are higher at: 0.625 vs. EIPAF (0.420). EIPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.4B vs. NFG (1.31B). NFG has less debt than EIPAF: NFG (2.83B) vs EIPAF (34.7B). EIPAF has higher revenues than NFG: EIPAF (85B) vs NFG (2.28B).
EIPAFNFGEIPAF / NFG
Capitalization56.5B7.66B738%
EBITDA23.4B1.31B1,792%
Gain YTD0.4200.62567%
P/E Ratio20.0514.18141%
Revenue85B2.28B3,731%
Total Cash16.3BN/A-
Total Debt34.7B2.83B1,225%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIPAF vs NFG: Fundamental Ratings
EIPAF
NFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9362
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3125
SMR RATING
1..100
8450
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIPAF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as NFG (44) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EIPAF (31) in the null industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's SMR Rating (50) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EIPAF (84) in the null industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as NFG (58) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFG (100) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIPAFNFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIPAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAOSX17.670.12
+0.68%
Harbor International Core Institutional
VIMSX81.930.17
+0.21%
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
DNLDX59.490.03
+0.05%
BNY Mellon Active MidCap A
MECFX16.07-0.01
-0.06%
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Class I
CTHRX115.57-1.87
-1.59%
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst2

EIPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EIPAF and GLPEF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EIPAF and GLPEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIPAF
1D Price
Change %
EIPAF100%
N/A
GLPEF - EIPAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.02%
BPAQF - EIPAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
NFG - EIPAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
SLNG - EIPAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
TGS - EIPAF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
More

NFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFG has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFG jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFG
1D Price
Change %
NFG100%
+0.89%
SHEL - NFG
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
TTE - NFG
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
CVX - NFG
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
XOM - NFG
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.89%
BP - NFG
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More