EIHDF
Price
$0.81
Change
+$0.08 (+10.96%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
622.65M
GMVHF
Price
$12.80
Change
+$0.71 (+5.87%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIHDF vs GMVHF

Header iconEIHDF vs GMVHF Comparison
Open Charts EIHDF vs GMVHFBanner chart's image
888 Holdings
Price$0.81
Change+$0.08 (+10.96%)
Volume$110
Capitalization622.65M
ENTAIN
Price$12.80
Change+$0.71 (+5.87%)
Volume$4.49K
Capitalization11.38B
EIHDF vs GMVHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EIHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIHDF vs. GMVHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIHDF is a Hold and GMVHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EIHDF: $0.81 vs. GMVHF: $12.80)
Brand notoriety: EIHDF and GMVHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIHDF: 4% vs. GMVHF: 22%
Market capitalization -- EIHDF: $622.65M vs. GMVHF: $11.38B
EIHDF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $622.65M. GMVHF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $11.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMVHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EIHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMVHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMVHF is a better buy in the long-term than EIHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIHDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMVHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EIHDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GMVHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EIHDF is a better buy in the short-term than GMVHF.

Price Growth

EIHDF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMVHF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMVHF($11.4B) has a higher market cap than EIHDF($623M). GMVHF has higher P/E ratio than EIHDF: GMVHF (222.22) vs EIHDF (11.25). GMVHF YTD gains are higher at: 49.010 vs. EIHDF (8.364). GMVHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 547M vs. EIHDF (60.2M). GMVHF has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. EIHDF (300M). EIHDF has less debt than GMVHF: EIHDF (19M) vs GMVHF (3.4B). GMVHF has higher revenues than EIHDF: GMVHF (4.3B) vs EIHDF (541M).
EIHDFGMVHFEIHDF / GMVHF
Capitalization623M11.4B5%
EBITDA60.2M547M11%
Gain YTD8.36449.01017%
P/E Ratio11.25222.225%
Revenue541M4.3B13%
Total Cash300M606M50%
Total Debt19M3.4B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIHDF vs GMVHF: Fundamental Ratings
EIHDF
GMVHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
6098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
822
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIHDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMVHF (79). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as EIHDF (100). This means that GMVHF’s stock grew similarly to EIHDF’s over the last 12 months.

EIHDF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMVHF (98). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as EIHDF (55). This means that GMVHF’s stock grew similarly to EIHDF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EIHDF (82). This means that GMVHF’s stock grew significantly faster than EIHDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIHDFGMVHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBUC32.350.84
+2.67%
Brookfield Business Corp
BPYPN13.800.36
+2.66%
Brookfield Property Partners LP
FULC6.92-0.01
-0.14%
Fulcrum Therapeutics
LEVI19.11-0.12
-0.62%
Levi Strauss & Co
VTGN2.00-0.04
-1.96%
VistaGen Therapeutics

EIHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EIHDF has been loosely correlated with CPHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EIHDF jumps, then CPHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIHDF
1D Price
Change %
EIHDF100%
N/A
CPHC - EIHDF
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.08%
EHGRF - EIHDF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHF - EIHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
EVVTY - EIHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
GEBHF - EIHDF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GMVHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMVHF and EVVTY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMVHF and EVVTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMVHF
1D Price
Change %
GMVHF100%
+5.87%
EVVTY - GMVHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
GMVHY - GMVHF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
GEBHF - GMVHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIGNF - GMVHF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EIHDF - GMVHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More