EIHDF
Price
$0.81
Change
+$0.08 (+10.96%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
622.65M
GEBHF
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.02 (-2.78%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIHDF vs GEBHF

Header iconEIHDF vs GEBHF Comparison
Open Charts EIHDF vs GEBHFBanner chart's image
888 Holdings
Price$0.81
Change+$0.08 (+10.96%)
Volume$110
Capitalization622.65M
Genting Berhad
Price$0.70
Change-$0.02 (-2.78%)
Volume$236
Capitalization3.57B
EIHDF vs GEBHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EIHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIHDF vs. GEBHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIHDF is a Hold and GEBHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EIHDF: $0.81 vs. GEBHF: $0.70)
Brand notoriety: EIHDF and GEBHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIHDF: 4% vs. GEBHF: 88%
Market capitalization -- EIHDF: $622.65M vs. GEBHF: $3.57B
EIHDF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $622.65M. GEBHF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $3.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGEBHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EIHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GEBHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GEBHF is a better buy in the long-term than EIHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIHDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEBHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EIHDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GEBHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EIHDF is a better buy in the short-term than GEBHF.

Price Growth

EIHDF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GEBHF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEBHF($3.57B) has a higher market cap than EIHDF($623M). EIHDF YTD gains are higher at: 8.364 vs. GEBHF (-23.680). GEBHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.32B vs. EIHDF (60.2M). GEBHF has more cash in the bank: 22B vs. EIHDF (300M). EIHDF has less debt than GEBHF: EIHDF (19M) vs GEBHF (39.5B). GEBHF has higher revenues than EIHDF: GEBHF (24B) vs EIHDF (541M).
EIHDFGEBHFEIHDF / GEBHF
Capitalization623M3.57B17%
EBITDA60.2M7.32B1%
Gain YTD8.364-23.680-35%
P/E Ratio11.25N/A-
Revenue541M24B2%
Total Cash300M22B1%
Total Debt19M39.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIHDF vs GEBHF: Fundamental Ratings
EIHDF
GEBHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5042

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIHDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as GEBHF (18). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to GEBHF’s over the last 12 months.

EIHDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GEBHF (100). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to GEBHF’s over the last 12 months.

EIHDF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GEBHF (89). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to GEBHF’s over the last 12 months.

EIHDF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as GEBHF (64). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to GEBHF’s over the last 12 months.

GEBHF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EIHDF (82). This means that GEBHF’s stock grew significantly faster than EIHDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIHDFGEBHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFI57.050.90
+1.60%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momt ETF
HFXI29.640.10
+0.34%
NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF
SWAN30.640.02
+0.07%
Amplify BlackSwan Gr & Trsry Cor ETF
MVAL32.44N/A
N/A
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
MLPD25.00-0.04
-0.16%
Global X MLP & Engy Infras Cov Cll ETF

EIHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EIHDF has been loosely correlated with CPHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EIHDF jumps, then CPHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIHDF
1D Price
Change %
EIHDF100%
N/A
CPHC - EIHDF
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.08%
EHGRF - EIHDF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHF - EIHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
EVVTY - EIHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
GEBHF - EIHDF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GEBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEBHF and GAMB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEBHF and GAMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEBHF
1D Price
Change %
GEBHF100%
N/A
GAMB - GEBHF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
ARHN - GEBHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - GEBHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
PYTCF - GEBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHF - GEBHF
16%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
More