EIG
Price
$46.92
Change
-$0.60 (-1.26%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
39 days until earnings call
HIPO
Price
$28.26
Change
-$1.30 (-4.40%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
444.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIG vs HIPO

Header iconEIG vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts EIG vs HIPOBanner chart's image
Employers Holdings
Price$46.92
Change-$0.60 (-1.26%)
Volume$144.28K
Capitalization1.13B
Hippo Holdings
Price$28.26
Change-$1.30 (-4.40%)
Volume$382.15K
Capitalization444.16M
EIG vs HIPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
EIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIG vs. HIPO commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIG is a Hold and HIPO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (EIG: $46.92 vs. HIPO: $28.26)
Brand notoriety: EIG and HIPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIG: 93% vs. HIPO: 159%
Market capitalization -- EIG: $1.13B vs. HIPO: $444.16M
EIG [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $1.13B. HIPO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $444.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EIG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EIG is a better buy in the long-term than HIPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EIG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIPO is a better buy in the short-term than EIG.

Price Growth

EIG (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while HIPO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

EIG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.24% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIG($1.13B) has a higher market cap than HIPO($444M). EIG has higher P/E ratio than HIPO: EIG (10.06) vs HIPO (0.45). HIPO YTD gains are higher at: 5.566 vs. EIG (-7.270). EIG has more cash in the bank: 913M vs. HIPO (401M). EIG has less debt than HIPO: EIG (5.9M) vs HIPO (14.8M). EIG has higher revenues than HIPO: EIG (851M) vs HIPO (210M).
EIGHIPOEIG / HIPO
Capitalization1.13B444M255%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.2705.566-131%
P/E Ratio10.060.452,217%
Revenue851M210M405%
Total Cash913M401M228%
Total Debt5.9M14.8M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIG: Fundamental Ratings
EIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIGHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCCNX75.05-0.12
-0.16%
Fidelity Advisor Canada C
JHTGX19.33-0.11
-0.57%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 R5
CDIRX34.19-0.32
-0.93%
Columbia Dividend Income R
RTSGX5.85-0.08
-1.35%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth R6
IPSIX19.81-0.41
-2.03%
Voya Index Plus SmallCap Port I

EIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EIG has been closely correlated with AMSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EIG jumps, then AMSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIG
1D Price
Change %
EIG100%
-1.26%
AMSF - EIG
71%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
AIZ - EIG
68%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
AXS - EIG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
ACT - EIG
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
MTG - EIG
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
-4.40%
FNF - HIPO
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
FAF - HIPO
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
TRUP - HIPO
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
EIG - HIPO
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
MTG - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More