It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EIG (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +2.48% price change this week, while FNF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +7.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.77%.
EIG is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
FNF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
| EIG | FNF | EIG / FNF | |
| Capitalization | 881M | 15.9B | 6% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -21.895 | 7.027 | -312% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.32 | 13.72 | 112% |
| Revenue | 890M | 13.3B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 1.01B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.4M | 4.78B | 0% |
EIG | FNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EIG's Valuation (34) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FNF (35) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that EIG’s stock grew similarly to FNF’s over the last 12 months.
FNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as EIG (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew similarly to EIG’s over the last 12 months.
EIG's SMR Rating (72) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FNF (94) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that EIG’s stock grew similarly to FNF’s over the last 12 months.
FNF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as EIG (78) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew similarly to EIG’s over the last 12 months.
EIG's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNF (87) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that EIG’s stock grew significantly faster than FNF’s over the last 12 months.
| EIG | FNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 52% | 9 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 49% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NMS | 12.06 | 0.07 | +0.58% |
| Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| PDCC | 16.12 | 0.02 | +0.12% |
| Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. | |||
| FTCB | 21.39 | -0.04 | -0.19% |
| First Trust Core Investment Grade ETF | |||
| TPHD | 38.41 | -0.23 | -0.61% |
| Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF | |||
| XCLR | 30.03 | -0.44 | -1.45% |
| Global X S&P 500® Collar 95-110 ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EIG has been closely correlated with AMSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EIG jumps, then AMSF could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNF has been closely correlated with FAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNF jumps, then FAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNF | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| FAF - FNF | 80% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ESNT - FNF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| RDN - FNF | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| MTG - FNF | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| NMIH - FNF | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||