Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RWMHX
EIFVX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RWMHX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$21.03
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.49M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$65.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
EIFVX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RWMHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. EIFVX (198M). RWMHX (1.30) and EIFVX (1.26) have matching dividends . EIFVX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: EIFVX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). EIFVX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RWMHX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. EIFVX (4.32). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 41.73 vs. EIFVX (29.33).
| EIFVX | RWMHX | EIFVX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.41 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.41 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.945 | 8.182 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.30 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 6.04 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.58 | 32.61 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.33 | 41.73 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.77 | 80.06 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement