Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RWMHX
EIFVX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RWMHX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$20.94
Change+$0.10 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.64
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
EIFVX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. EIFVX (240M). RWMHX (1.33) and EIFVX (1.31) have matching dividends . EIFVX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: EIFVX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). EIFVX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RWMHX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. EIFVX (-2.77). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.64 vs. EIFVX (39.88).
| EIFVX | RWMHX | EIFVX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.41 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.41 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.491 | 9.663 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 206B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.33 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.77 | 3.99 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.42 | 41.40 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.88 | 49.64 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement