Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RMFEX
EIFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$20.94
Change+$0.10 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
EIFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. EIFVX (240M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than EIFVX: RMFEX (1.46) vs EIFVX (1.31). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: EIFVX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). EIFVX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMFEX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. EIFVX (-2.77). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. EIFVX (39.88).
| EIFVX | RMFEX | EIFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.62 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.491 | 13.941 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.46 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.77 | 5.28 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.42 | 40.09 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.88 | 59.52 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.56 | 98.84 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement