Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RMFCX
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$21.04
Change+$0.19 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.73M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. EIFVX (238M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: EIFVX (1.33) vs RMFCX (1.24). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIFVX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.81). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. EIFVX (-1.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. EIFVX (46.32).
| EIFVX | RMFCX | EIFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.038 | 13.245 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.24 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | 6.41 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.18 | 42.10 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.32 | 63.20 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.90 | 103.62 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement