Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RMFCX
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$22.11
Change+$1.05 (+4.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.03M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. EIFVX (70M). RMFCX (1.24) and EIFVX (1.18) have matching dividends . EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIFVX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.81). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). EIFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.25 vs. RMFCX (7.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. EIFVX (31.07).
| EIFVX | RMFCX | EIFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.145 | 2.244 | 274% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.24 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.25 | 7.45 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.53 | 28.73 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.07 | 44.16 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.65 | 105.79 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement