Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RMEBX
EIFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$21.56
Change+$0.10 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.44M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.62
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.07B
EIFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. EIFVX (237M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: EIFVX (1.29) vs RMEBX (1.05). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EIFVX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.81). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMEBX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. EIFVX (-1.74). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. EIFVX (35.74).
| EIFVX | RMEBX | EIFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.615 | 14.940 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.05 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.74 | 6.55 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.58 | 30.03 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.74 | 53.80 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.27 | 92.20 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers