Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs TRCLX
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.06
Change-$0.19 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.16M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. EICGX (42.2M). EICGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EICGX (1.74) vs TRCLX (1.49). EICGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EICGX (16 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (1.73) and EICGX (1.71) have similar cost to investors . TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. EICGX (48.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: TRCLX (500000) vs EICGX (1000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. EICGX (23.64). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. EICGX (-39.42).
| EICGX | TRCLX | EICGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.03 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.73 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.440 | 10.035 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 66.9M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.49 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.64 | 50.04 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.90 | 28.71 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.42 | -9.00 | 438% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement