Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs TRCLX
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.63
Change-$0.30 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.84M
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 61.8M vs. EICGX (45.5M). EICGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EICGX (1.73) vs TRCLX (1.34). EICGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EICGX (16 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EICGX (1.68). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EICGX (77.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: TRCLX (500000) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.64 vs. TRCLX (27.19). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.01 vs. EICGX (-28.05).
| EICGX | TRCLX | EICGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.03 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.169 | 29.072 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 61.8M | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.34 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.64 | 27.19 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.42 | 32.10 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.05 | -3.01 | 933% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement