Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.20
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. EICGX (42.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (2.83) vs EICGX (1.83). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX (35.38) and MCDFX (33.67) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.21 vs. EICGX (-35.20).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.349 | 31.737 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 99.3M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.38 | 33.67 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.89 | 21.70 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.20 | -5.21 | 676% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.77 | 38.53 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement