Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$16.95
Change-$0.09 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. EICGX (39.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (3.26) vs EICGX (2.02). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.64 vs. MCDFX (23.77). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.58 vs. EICGX (-30.90).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.858 | 13.498 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 88.3M | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 3.26 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.64 | 23.77 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.40 | -1.98 | 778% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.90 | -8.58 | 360% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.86 | 14.34 | -145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement