Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.46
Change+$0.13 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. EICGX (42.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (2.83) vs EICGX (1.83). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. EICGX (48.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.35 vs. EICGX (24.90). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.14 vs. EICGX (-31.16).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.179 | 28.538 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 97.7M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.90 | 27.35 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.04 | 16.44 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.16 | -8.14 | 383% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.02 | 40.04 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement