Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$16.93
Change-$0.26 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.71M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.30
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. EICGX (38.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (3.62) vs EICGX (2.10). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.59 vs. MCDFX (22.13). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.33 vs. EICGX (-28.18).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.721 | 12.616 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 93.9M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 3.62 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.59 | 22.13 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.11 | 3.33 | -333% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.18 | -3.33 | 846% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.95 | 2.16 | -1,110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement