Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKTX
EICGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.11
Change+$0.25 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$49.75
Change+$0.63 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
EICGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and FHKTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. EICGX (42.6M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: EICGX (1.86) vs FHKTX (0.88). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKTX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.49 vs. FHKTX (43.50). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.89 vs. EICGX (-25.70).
| EICGX | FHKTX | EICGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.43 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.622 | 29.093 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 1.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 0.88 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.49 | 43.50 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.62 | 58.39 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.70 | 5.89 | -436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.65 | 88.80 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement