Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKTX
EICGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.95
Change-$0.12 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$52.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
EICGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. EICGX (42.4M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: EICGX (1.83) vs FHKTX (0.80). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKTX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.28 vs. EICGX (35.38). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -1.77 vs. EICGX (-35.20).
| EICGX | FHKTX | EICGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.43 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.349 | 39.028 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 0.80 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.38 | 38.28 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.89 | 67.60 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.20 | -1.77 | 1,988% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.77 | 112.80 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement