Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKTX
EICGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$54.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
EICGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. EICGX (43.7M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: EICGX (1.80) vs FHKTX (0.77). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKTX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKTX (40.03) and EICGX (38.54) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 3.69 vs. EICGX (-31.52).
| EICGX | FHKTX | EICGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.43 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.586 | 42.970 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.77 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.54 | 40.03 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.04 | 90.29 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.52 | 3.69 | -853% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.47 | 93.66 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement