Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKIX
EICGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.11
Change+$0.25 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$50.63
Change+$0.65 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
EICGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. EICGX (42.6M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: EICGX (1.86) vs FHKIX (1.15). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKIX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.49 vs. FHKIX (44.24). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.07 vs. EICGX (-25.70).
| EICGX | FHKIX | EICGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.90 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.90 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.622 | 29.549 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 1.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.15 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.49 | 44.24 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.62 | 61.00 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.70 | 9.07 | -283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.65 | 94.39 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement