Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKIX
EICGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.46
Change+$0.13 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.13
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
EICGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. EICGX (42.4M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: EICGX (1.83) vs FHKIX (1.04). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKIX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.16 vs. EICGX (24.90). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.78 vs. EICGX (-31.16).
| EICGX | FHKIX | EICGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.90 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.90 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.179 | 39.295 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.04 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.90 | 37.16 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.04 | 69.39 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.16 | 5.78 | -539% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.02 | 121.48 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement