Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKCX
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$16.97
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
Fidelity China Region
Price$44.35
Change-$0.61 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. EICGX (39.8M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EICGX (2.02) vs FHKCX (1.22). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKCX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.64 vs. FHKCX (19.55). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.62 vs. EICGX (-30.90).
| EICGX | FHKCX | EICGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.858 | 15.608 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 1.24B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.22 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.64 | 19.55 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.40 | 31.29 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.90 | 3.62 | -853% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.86 | 42.79 | -49% |