Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKCX
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.75
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. EICGX (45.5M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EICGX (1.73) vs FHKCX (0.98). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKCX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKCX (35.17) and EICGX (33.64) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.29 vs. EICGX (-28.05).
| EICGX | FHKCX | EICGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.169 | 41.579 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 0.98 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.64 | 35.17 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.42 | 104.26 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.05 | 11.29 | -248% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.26 | 92.82 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement