Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKCX
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$16.93
Change-$0.26 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.71M
Fidelity China Region
Price$43.26
Change-$0.67 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. EICGX (38.7M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EICGX (2.10) vs FHKCX (1.32). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKCX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.59 vs. FHKCX (17.53). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.44 vs. EICGX (-28.18).
| EICGX | FHKCX | EICGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.721 | 11.237 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 1.15B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.32 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.59 | 17.53 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.11 | 28.81 | -39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.18 | 7.44 | -379% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.95 | 22.30 | -107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers