Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKCX
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity China Region
Price$55.88
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. EICGX (43.7M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EICGX (1.80) vs FHKCX (0.96). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKCX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.75 vs. EICGX (38.54). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.90 vs. EICGX (-31.52).
| EICGX | FHKCX | EICGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.586 | 43.610 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.96 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.54 | 40.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.04 | 93.38 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.52 | 6.90 | -457% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.47 | 99.92 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement