Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKCX
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$17.87
Change-$0.12 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.19
Change-$0.04 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. EICGX (39.8M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EICGX (2.02) vs FHKCX (1.22). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKCX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.47 vs. FHKCX (34.02). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.89 vs. EICGX (-30.31).
| EICGX | FHKCX | EICGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.146 | 21.445 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 1.24B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.22 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.47 | 34.02 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.22 | 45.44 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.31 | 2.89 | -1,048% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.42 | 57.62 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement