Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKCX
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.22
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. EICGX (42.4M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EICGX (1.83) vs FHKCX (1.00). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKCX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.03 vs. EICGX (35.38). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.28 vs. EICGX (-35.20).
| EICGX | FHKCX | EICGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.349 | 39.702 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.00 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.38 | 39.03 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.89 | 70.29 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.20 | 1.28 | -2,755% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.77 | 120.91 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement