Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKAX
EICGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.46
Change+$0.13 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.80
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
EICGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. EICGX (42.4M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: EICGX (1.83) vs FHKAX (0.88). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKAX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.12 vs. EICGX (24.90). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.43 vs. EICGX (-31.16).
| EICGX | FHKAX | EICGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.18 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.179 | 39.234 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 0.88 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.90 | 37.12 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.04 | 68.35 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.16 | 4.43 | -703% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.02 | 118.04 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement