Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKAX
EICGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.61
Change-$0.08 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$54.43
Change-$0.56 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
EICGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. EICGX (43.7M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: EICGX (1.80) vs FHKAX (0.85). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKAX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKAX (40.37) and EICGX (38.54) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.18 vs. EICGX (-31.52).
| EICGX | FHKAX | EICGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.18 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.586 | 43.274 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.85 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.54 | 40.37 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.04 | 91.79 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.52 | 5.18 | -608% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.47 | 96.38 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement