Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FCHKX
EICGX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FCHKX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.06
Change-$0.19 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.16M
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$55.86
Change-$0.88 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
EICGX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FCHKX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FCHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. EICGX (42.2M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: EICGX (1.74) vs FCHKX (0.79). EICGX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: EICGX (16 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than EICGX (1.71). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FCHKX (250) vs EICGX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.38 vs. EICGX (23.64). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -3.52 vs. EICGX (-39.42).
| EICGX | FCHKX | EICGX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.92 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.92 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.440 | 10.820 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 2.07B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 0.79 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.64 | 55.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.90 | 67.02 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.42 | -3.52 | 1,119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.50 | 185.07 | 9% |