EICCF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.12 (-60.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
UCAR
Price
$6.65
Change
-$0.50 (-6.99%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

EICCF vs UCAR

Header iconEICCF vs UCAR Comparison
Open Charts EICCF vs UCARBanner chart's image
E Automotive
Price$0.08
Change-$0.12 (-60.00%)
Volume$1.27K
CapitalizationN/A
U Power
Price$6.65
Change-$0.50 (-6.99%)
Volume$7.42K
CapitalizationN/A
EICCF vs UCAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
UCAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICCF vs. UCAR commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICCF is a Hold and UCAR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (EICCF: $0.08 vs. UCAR: $6.65)
Brand notoriety: EICCF and UCAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICCF: 100% vs. UCAR: 30%
Market capitalization -- EICCF: $132.87M vs. UCAR: $3.89M
EICCF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $132.87M. UCAR’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $3.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUCAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EICCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UCAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EICCF is a better buy in the long-term than UCAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UCAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UCAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EICCF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UCAR (@Specialty Stores) price change was -11.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -5.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-5.55% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICCF($133M) has a higher market cap than UCAR($3.89M). EICCF YTD gains are higher at: 7999900.000 vs. UCAR (-61.039).
EICCFUCAREICCF / UCAR
Capitalization133M3.89M3,416%
EBITDA-36.28MN/A-
Gain YTD7999900.000-61.039-13,106,277%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue116MN/A-
Total Cash15.8MN/A-
Total Debt14MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UCAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
UCAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

EICCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EICCF and TKLF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EICCF and TKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICCF
1D Price
Change %
EICCF100%
N/A
TKLF - EICCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.72%
UCAR - EICCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.99%
NAAS - EICCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
SDA - EICCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
ARHS - EICCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.49%
More

UCAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UCAR and CRMT have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCAR and CRMT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCAR
1D Price
Change %
UCAR100%
+0.98%
CRMT - UCAR
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
CHPT - UCAR
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
MNSO - UCAR
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
CVNA - UCAR
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
BQ - UCAR
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More