EICCF vs UCAR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICCF is a Hold and UCAR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EICCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUCAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EICCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UCAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
UCAR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- UCAR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EICCF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UCAR (@Specialty Stores) price change was -12.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.14%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-2.09% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| EICCF | UCAR | EICCF / UCAR | |
| Capitalization | 133M | 3.89M | 3,416% |
| EBITDA | -36.28M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 7999900.000 | -61.853 | -12,933,759% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 116M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 15.8M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14M | N/A | - |
| UCAR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
EICCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICCF has been loosely correlated with SCCAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICCF jumps, then SCCAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EICCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EICCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SCCAF - EICCF | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TKLF - EICCF | 9% Poorly correlated | +17.33% | ||
| UCAR - EICCF | 7% Poorly correlated | +8.86% | ||
| NAAS - EICCF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| SDA - EICCF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||
UCAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UCAR and MNSO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCAR and MNSO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCAR | 100% | +8.86% | ||
| MNSO - UCAR | 24% Poorly correlated | -6.35% | ||
| EVGO - UCAR | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
| GRWG - UCAR | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.81% | ||
| BQ - UCAR | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.60% | ||
| NVVE - UCAR | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||