EICA
Price
$24.59
Change
-$0.09 (-0.36%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MGLD
Price
$1.07
Change
+$0.02 (+1.90%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
46.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EICA vs MGLD

Header iconEICA vs MGLD Comparison
Open Charts EICA vs MGLDBanner chart's image
Eagle Point Income
Price$24.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
Volume$538
CapitalizationN/A
Marygold Companies (The)
Price$1.07
Change+$0.02 (+1.90%)
Volume$11.83K
Capitalization46.1M
EICA vs MGLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICA vs. MGLD commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICA is a Buy and MGLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EICA: $24.59 vs. MGLD: $1.07)
Brand notoriety: EICA and MGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICA: 22% vs. MGLD: 90%
Market capitalization -- EICA: $0 vs. MGLD: $46.1M
EICA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. MGLD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $46.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EICA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGLD is a better buy in the long-term than EICA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EICA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGLD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EICA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MGLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGLD is a better buy in the short-term than EICA.

Price Growth

EICA (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.34% price change this week, while MGLD (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICA YTD gains are higher at: 7.658 vs. MGLD (-39.205). MGLD has more cash in the bank: 15.6M vs. EICA (31.1K). MGLD has less debt than EICA: MGLD (4.92M) vs EICA (8.49M).
EICAMGLDEICA / MGLD
CapitalizationN/A46.1M-
EBITDAN/A-6.7M-
Gain YTD7.658-39.205-20%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A31.2M-
Total Cash31.1K15.6M0%
Total Debt8.49M4.92M172%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGLD: Fundamental Ratings
MGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EICAMGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LILAK8.390.15
+1.82%
Liberty Latin America Ltd
OXLCP24.530.11
+0.46%
Oxford Lane Capital Corp
HQY96.530.37
+0.38%
HealthEquity
DWSN1.83-0.02
-1.08%
Dawson Geophysical Company
HYLN2.08-0.10
-4.59%
Hyliion Holdings Corp

EICA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICA has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICA jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICA
1D Price
Change %
EICA100%
-0.36%
EICB - EICA
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
OXLCO - EICA
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
ECCC - EICA
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
OXLCN - EICA
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OCCIO - EICA
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More

MGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGLD and HNNA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGLD and HNNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGLD
1D Price
Change %
MGLD100%
+1.90%
HNNA - MGLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
RESCU - MGLD
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICMB - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
AB - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
EICA - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More