EHTH
Price
$4.06
Change
-$0.08 (-1.93%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
37 days until earnings call
SLQT
Price
$1.92
Change
-$0.02 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EHTH vs SLQT

Header iconEHTH vs SLQT Comparison
Open Charts EHTH vs SLQTBanner chart's image
eHealth
Price$4.06
Change-$0.08 (-1.93%)
Volume$106.73K
CapitalizationN/A
SelectQuote
Price$1.92
Change-$0.02 (-1.03%)
Volume$695.95K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
EHTH vs SLQT Comparison Chart
Loading...
EHTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLQT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
EHTH vs. SLQT commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHTH is a Hold and SLQT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (EHTH: $3.76 vs. SLQT: $3.68)
Brand notoriety: EHTH: Notable vs. SLQT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EHTH: 109% vs. SLQT: 88%
Market capitalization -- EHTH: $174.5M vs. SLQT: $337.99M
EHTH [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $174.5M. SLQT’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $337.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $21.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EHTH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLQT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EHTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLQT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHTH is a better buy in the long-term than SLQT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EHTH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLQT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EHTH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLQT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLQT is a better buy in the short-term than EHTH.

Price Growth

EHTH (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -7.39% price change this week, while SLQT (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -10.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

EHTH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2024.

SLQT is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (+2.24% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLQT($338M) has a higher market cap than EHTH($174M). EHTH has higher P/E ratio than SLQT: EHTH (37.17) vs SLQT (6.88). SLQT YTD gains are higher at: 168.613 vs. EHTH (-56.881). SLQT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 56.5M vs. EHTH (295K). EHTH has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. SLQT (10.8M). EHTH has less debt than SLQT: EHTH (103M) vs SLQT (724M). SLQT has higher revenues than EHTH: SLQT (1.16B) vs EHTH (453M).
EHTHSLQTEHTH / SLQT
Capitalization174M338M51%
EBITDA295K56.5M1%
Gain YTD-56.881168.613-34%
P/E Ratio37.176.88540%
Revenue453M1.16B39%
Total Cash122M10.8M1,130%
Total Debt103M724M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EHTH: Fundamental Ratings
EHTH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EHTHSLQT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EHTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLQT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

EHTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EHTH has been loosely correlated with SLQT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EHTH jumps, then SLQT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHTH
1D Price
Change %
EHTH100%
-7.16%
SLQT - EHTH
51%
Loosely correlated
-9.80%
GOCO - EHTH
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
CRVL - EHTH
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
FANH - EHTH
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
AJG - EHTH
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
More

SLQT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLQT has been loosely correlated with EHTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLQT jumps, then EHTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLQT
1D Price
Change %
SLQT100%
-9.80%
EHTH - SLQT
51%
Loosely correlated
-7.16%
GOCO - SLQT
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
BRO - SLQT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
CRVL - SLQT
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
WTW - SLQT
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More